LwAX3tuFbz

dofKnRNvJPKA
3tmPLwLp
Wiley
You miss the point of Conflict of Interest think about it You got some citizen or flesh and blood man, woman or child on cheargs of DUI (a charge that cannot be defended against by the way AS YOU CAN BE INFLUENCED BY A CAN OF SODA GETTING A SUGAR HIGH THUS; DUI NO DEFENSE WHATSOEVER GUARANTEED REVENUE MACHINE) and they are brought before the judge to be heard even a jury.A jury can judge the facts, evidence and/or etc. but; the judge judges the law The DUI charge is levied by the STATE OF WHATEVER and the STATE is against the Defendant BUT; the Judge is also Judging BY AND THROUGH THE AUTHORITY OF THE STATE So The judge is no longer AN IMPARTIAL ENTITY AS HE IS EMPLOYED OR GRANTED HIS AUTHORITY TO ACT BY THE STATE OF WHATEVER therefore, since the Plaintiff (STATE OF WHATEVER STATE) is alleging the Defendant of a criminal act and the Judge is also granted ALL his authority/jurisdiction to act and pass judgments AS AN IMPARTIAL PARTY AND IS NOT That; my friend is what CONFLICT OF INTEREST IS the judge is acting on the behalf of the Plaintiff as his living comes from and so does his authority to carry out his job FROM THE STATE/PLAINTIFF IN THE MATTER AGAINST A DEFENDANT THAT IS BUT A WEE LITTLE SHEEP Should not the judge then recuse himself from EVERY MATTER NOT BROUGHT BY PRIVATE ATTORNEY AGAINST A PRIVATE PARTY???Bass turds a floating in a sea of corruptions no wonder the goddess holding the scales with a blind fold does so that she might not have to look at men dressing up like her and making a mockery of truth guess even an unrighteous goddess has some form of a conscience???Hope this answers your question better than you asked it;Aintmyfault
Preis € 0,00
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100003437486420
AeooDJVB9_MoGEzdtcs
You miss the point of Conflict of Interest think about it You got some citizen or flesh and blood man, woman or child on cheargs of DUI (a charge that cannot be defended against by the way AS YOU CAN BE INFLUENCED BY A CAN OF SODA GETTING A SUGAR HIGH THUS; DUI NO DEFENSE WHATSOEVER GUARANTEED REVENUE MACHINE) and they are brought before the judge to be heard even a jury.A jury can judge the facts, evidence and/or etc. but; the judge judges the law The DUI charge is levied by the STATE OF WHATEVER and the STATE is against the Defendant BUT; the Judge is also Judging BY AND THROUGH THE AUTHORITY OF THE STATE So The judge is no longer AN IMPARTIAL ENTITY AS HE IS EMPLOYED OR GRANTED HIS AUTHORITY TO ACT BY THE STATE OF WHATEVER therefore, since the Plaintiff (STATE OF WHATEVER STATE) is alleging the Defendant of a criminal act and the Judge is also granted ALL his authority/jurisdiction to act and pass judgments AS AN IMPARTIAL PARTY AND IS NOT That; my friend is what CONFLICT OF INTEREST IS the judge is acting on the behalf of the Plaintiff as his living comes from and so does his authority to carry out his job FROM THE STATE/PLAINTIFF IN THE MATTER AGAINST A DEFENDANT THAT IS BUT A WEE LITTLE SHEEP Should not the judge then recuse himself from EVERY MATTER NOT BROUGHT BY PRIVATE ATTORNEY AGAINST A PRIVATE PARTY???Bass turds a floating in a sea of corruptions no wonder the goddess holding the scales with a blind fold does so that she might not have to look at men dressing up like her and making a mockery of truth guess even an unrighteous goddess has some form of a conscience???Hope this answers your question better than you asked it;Aintmyfault
You miss the point of Conflict of Interest think about it You got some citizen or flesh and blood man, woman or child on cheargs of DUI (a charge that cannot be defended against by the way AS YOU CAN BE INFLUENCED BY A CAN OF SODA GETTING A SUGAR HIGH THUS; DUI NO DEFENSE WHATSOEVER GUARANTEED REVENUE MACHINE) and they are brought before the judge to be heard even a jury.A jury can judge the facts, evidence and/or etc. but; the judge judges the law The DUI charge is levied by the STATE OF WHATEVER and the STATE is against the Defendant BUT; the Judge is also Judging BY AND THROUGH THE AUTHORITY OF THE STATE So The judge is no longer AN IMPARTIAL ENTITY AS HE IS EMPLOYED OR GRANTED HIS AUTHORITY TO ACT BY THE STATE OF WHATEVER therefore, since the Plaintiff (STATE OF WHATEVER STATE) is alleging the Defendant of a criminal act and the Judge is also granted ALL his authority/jurisdiction to act and pass judgments AS AN IMPARTIAL PARTY AND IS NOT That; my friend is what CONFLICT OF INTEREST IS the judge is acting on the behalf of the Plaintiff as his living comes from and so does his authority to carry out his job FROM THE STATE/PLAINTIFF IN THE MATTER AGAINST A DEFENDANT THAT IS BUT A WEE LITTLE SHEEP Should not the judge then recuse himself from EVERY MATTER NOT BROUGHT BY PRIVATE ATTORNEY AGAINST A PRIVATE PARTY???Bass turds a floating in a sea of corruptions no wonder the goddess holding the scales with a blind fold does so that she might not have to look at men dressing up like her and making a mockery of truth guess even an unrighteous goddess has some form of a conscience???Hope this answers your question better than you asked it;Aintmyfault
You miss the point of Conflict of Interest think about it You got some citizen or flesh and blood man, woman or child on cheargs of DUI (a charge that cannot be defended against by the way AS YOU CAN BE INFLUENCED BY A CAN OF SODA GETTING A SUGAR HIGH THUS; DUI NO DEFENSE WHATSOEVER GUARANTEED REVENUE MACHINE) and they are brought before the judge to be heard even a jury.A jury can judge the facts, evidence and/or etc. but; the judge judges the law The DUI charge is levied by the STATE OF WHATEVER and the STATE is against the Defendant BUT; the Judge is also Judging BY AND THROUGH THE AUTHORITY OF THE STATE So The judge is no longer AN IMPARTIAL ENTITY AS HE IS EMPLOYED OR GRANTED HIS AUTHORITY TO ACT BY THE STATE OF WHATEVER therefore, since the Plaintiff (STATE OF WHATEVER STATE) is alleging the Defendant of a criminal act and the Judge is also granted ALL his authority/jurisdiction to act and pass judgments AS AN IMPARTIAL PARTY AND IS NOT That; my friend is what CONFLICT OF INTEREST IS the judge is acting on the behalf of the Plaintiff as his living comes from and so does his authority to carry out his job FROM THE STATE/PLAINTIFF IN THE MATTER AGAINST A DEFENDANT THAT IS BUT A WEE LITTLE SHEEP Should not the judge then recuse himself from EVERY MATTER NOT BROUGHT BY PRIVATE ATTORNEY AGAINST A PRIVATE PARTY???Bass turds a floating in a sea of corruptions no wonder the goddess holding the scales with a blind fold does so that she might not have to look at men dressing up like her and making a mockery of truth guess even an unrighteous goddess has some form of a conscience???Hope this answers your question better than you asked it;Aintmyfault
Powered by eZ Publish™ CMS Open Source Web Content Management. Copyright © 1999-2012 eZ Systems AS (except where otherwise noted). All rights reserved.